In this context, reputation is not general sentiment. It is the specific claims that answer engines make about you, and if these claims are true.

1. Find what answer engines say

Start with AI perception summary: the claims that answer engines make about you. Expect a mix of positive, neutral, and incorrect claims.

2. Separate the three types

  • True but not helpful: for example, “enterprise-focused” when you want mid-market customers. This is a positioning problem.
  • False: for example, a missing feature that you actually have, or an old price. This is a source problem: a cited source is incorrect.
  • True and damaging: an honest weakness. Content cannot correct this type. Possibly, the product can.
It is important to know the type, because the correct response is completely different for each type.

3. Monitor the important claims

Use Monitor perceptions for the claims that are important. A tracked perception keeps a history. Thus, you can prove that a change had an effect. Also, you can find a reversal in weeks, not at the next review.

4. Find the source of a false claim

Open the conversations that contain the claim, and read the cited sources. Almost always, a false claim comes from a cited source that contains an error. The fix is to correct that page. Do not publish a rebuttal on your own site, because answer engines give it less weight.

5. Use sentiment as an early warning

Sentiment tells you the general mood, not the claim. A decrease usually means that a new source has an effect on the answers. Find that source in Most cited sources.

6. Make it a routine

  • Run conversations weekly.
  • Track a small number of perceptions.
  • Record what you changed, and when.
Damage to your reputation in AI answers grows quietly. Nobody gets a notification when an answer engine starts to describe you differently.